Will Salas is a pissed 25 year-old for the third time, when his mother got timed off and his name tainted as time-lawmen accuse him of theft. He is forced to go undercover with the anime-eyes Sylvia Weis, daughter of a rich-ass, to bring down the system where the rich lives forever, and the poor will hurdle to borrow, barter, steal, and beg for minutes to last a day. They seek equality -- in time.
IN TIME IS BEAUTIFULLY SHOT. Roger Deakin's job here is good. Adding shades of gray and blue definitely adds a wee detail of the futuristic. Adding to the stir are faces of L.A. locales that gives modern mix to the film, leaving it effective, as it is.
IN TIME IS UNDERRATED. I'M PISSED. I mean it.
Anyway, with its superb story-telling, I strongly believe In Time deserves an admission in some scale. Action may be lacking intensity though.
IN TIME HAS SURPRISINGLY GREAT ACTING.
Cillian Murphy, the dude from one of my favorite terrifiers, 28 Days Later, star in this film as the timekeeper, or could be simply put, the sheriff, the lawman. He does fine. But I felt his character made look like a jackal chasing a rabbit, well if that's what his character is meant to look like, it effectively works.
Added note: In extreme reiteration, I would like to give credits to director-writer Andrew Niccol's almost immaculate writing and creation of this cleverly made world.
'In Time' is successful in introducing to us a future where time might always be running out. It tells a story of a singular figure--two to be exact--to fight for equality, let the poor have the same rights as of what rich people have. Though lacking grip and tension might be a potion to make us look at our clocks everytime. 3 stars.
0 comments:
Post a Comment